Rocket vs. conventional artillery...which is most effective?

I have been in the middle of this argument for many years. Bottom line: a robust fires capability requires both. Cannons provide accurate, responsive fires under all weather conditions. Rockets provide range and munitions that fill the gaps in Cannon fire support. Your checklist addresses some insignificant metrics and is misleading in others. 1. Why is recoil an issue? Accuracy, Range, Resupply and Rate of Fire are much more relevant. 2. Today’s cannons are as mobile or more so than rocket delivery systems. Digging in spades is very old technology. Few, if any active cannon systems employ this requirement. Several can fire across track from a halt just like rocket systems. 3. Rockets generate backblast and signature trails but they are typically positioned in the battlespace to make this characteristic irrelevant. This is not a discriminator unless you want Rocket systems to perform the cannon mission, which is a bad idea in the first place. 4. Cannon systems can perform MRSI. Even the old M102 can conduct MRSI at certain ranges. Rockets cannot conduct MRSI. Your table is referring to Time on Target. Both cannon and Rocket systems can execute TOT fires. 5. MLRS is larger than the M109 Paladin. Stating cannon systems are larger is wrong.
Replies (0)

PS: advantage over protection systems it always varies on different scenarios
Replies (0)

I would like to raise the comment about the facility of interception between the two methods of attack used, because unless it hits the target on whatever form or at least brings damage to the objective than its not effective at all. Both methods have their + and - but I think that a long range artillery shell guided as XM982 or a double packed shell with pre-final blast with kinetic based shrapnel can do some damage even by having C-RAM and Goal Keeper systems on guard and not forget Iron Dome of the Israel have done amazing job on intercepting artillery rocket, mortar rounds and short range shells. Its easier to intercept a rocket thats for sure, not impossible for atillery shells but conventional way seems more reliable to me at least to do some damage.
Replies (0)