Not a member? Sign Up

Reasons for Joining

    Address your challenges through knowledge sharing with peers from our global network of specialists.

    Benchmark your business initiatives with the who's who in the field.

    Hear from industry pioneers how to maximize ROI in today's challenging economy.

    And best of all It's FREE!
Sign in using your existing
Defence IQ account
Username or Email:

Sign Up  |  Already a member? Sign In  |  Visit IQPC.com  
Defence IQ
Loading

What does the grounding of the entire F-35 fleet mean for the $400 billion programme’s future?

Contributor:  Andrew Elwell
Posted:  02/25/2013  12:00:00 AM EST  | 
0

Rate this Article: (3.0 Stars | 7 Votes)
Tags:   f-35

After discovering a crack on a low pressure turbine blade of an F135 engine last week, Lockheed Martin took the precautionary measure of suspending all test flights of the Joint Strike Fighter. The engine is used in all three F-35 variants.

The company said in a press release that “it is too early to know the fleet-wide impact of this finding.” It could be that the impact turns out to be minor. However, for the worlds most costly and ambitious defence programme, which is already seven years behind schedule and 70% over budget, can any impact at all be described as minor?

Lieutenant General Christopher Bogdan, the Pentagon’s programme chief, told reporters in Melbourne that this hiccup was “unfortunate” but not out of the ordinary for development testing on a programme of this size.

The F-35 had only resumed service for a matter of days following the month-long suspension of its STOVL variant when the latest engine troubles were discovered. This set-back is not what the developers needed for a programme already under intense political scrutiny, especially with the threat of sequestration hanging over the US defence budget.

The F-35 is the most technologically advanced jet ever conceived; it's no surprise that it's encountering "teething" problems such as this. But considering the massive delays and spiralling costs, I'm not sure that's the point anymore.

What do you think this means for the JSF? Just a bump in the road or a final nail in the coffin? Send your thoughts to haveyoursay@defenceiq.com.



Andrew Elwell Contributor:   Andrew Elwell


* = required.

Not a member yet? Sign up
User Name:
Password:


Be the first to leave a comment
Sign in or Sign up to post a comment

Events of Interest
Download Brochure
To complete your download, please become a Defence IQ member by submitting the form below. Already a member? Sign in.
First Name *
Last Name *
Job Title *
Company Name *
Email Address *
Telephone *
Country *
Where did you hear about us? *

I would like to receive information about sponsorship and exhibition opportunities

Yes, sign me up for the FREE Defence IQ e-newsletter, including information on FREE Podcasts, Webinars, event discounts and online learning opportunities.

You Might Also Like