The Strategic Defence & Security Review (SDSR): A Brave New World for UK Defence and Security
SDSR | security | armed forces | RAF | Royal Navy | Coalition
The Coalition Government's spearheading of the Strategic Defence & Security Review (SDSR) comes at a time of widespread transformation in the defence and security sectors. Decisions made in upcoming months will heavily impact not only short term strategic planning in Afghanistan. They will also shape the structure and function of essential security roles currently filled by the Royal Air Force, the Royal Navy, and the Army. Inevitably, strategising solutions to fiscal limitations within the tri-service arena will affect significant touchstones of UK defence - from NATO to Trident to expeditionary deployments.
“My Government will fully support our courageous armed forces and undertake a full Strategic Defence and Security Review.”
- Queen’s Speech, 25 May 2010
At this time there is nothing more critical than understanding the choices and challenges that face the UK MoD as these decisions are made. The Green Paper published on 3rd February 2010 laid out some key areas that will help frame the Review:
- Given that domestic security cannot be separated from international security, where should we set the balance between focusing on our territory and region and engaging threats at a distance?
- What approach should we take if we employ the Armed Forces to address threats at distance?
- What contribution should the Armed Forces make in ensuring security and contributing to resilience within the UK?
- How could we more effectively employ the Armed Forces in support of wider efforts to prevent conflict and strengthen international stability?
- Do our current international defence and security relationships require rebalancing in the longer term?
- Should we further integrate our forces with those of key allies and partners?
- To what extent and in what areas should we continue to refocus our current efforts on Afghanistan?
These issues and more will be discussed in Defence IQ’s exclusive Webinar. Listen to high ranking experts within the UK Defence Community discuss the strategic implications for the UK military and for national security, as a whole. Join us in the discussion - post your comments and interact with others on our Defence IQ Networking forum .
-
Rethinking Information Activities, Counterinsurgency and Strategy in Afghanistan -
The Future of Army Heavy Vehicles -
Anti-Submarine Warfare Applications of Maritime Patrol Aircraft -
Lessons from Trident -
Tactics to Overcome Training Helicopter Challenges -
European Union and Cyber Security: State of Play, Challenges and the Way Ahead -
Expeditionary Naval Mine Warfare: Integrating One-Shot Capability on Mine Hunting Remotely Operated Vehicle -
Fighter Capability -
Focusing on Training Multi-role Supervision and Simulators -
Capabilities Needed in an Important Weapons System
* = required.
Afghanistan is not the future of all warfare, anymore than the Cold War was. More nations are building up navies, including advanced subs. Sophisticated air forces are increasing, not decreasing. State-to-state warfare will never be extinct. The UK should adhere to the *1998* SDR. |
DS6292, we'll be doing a follow-up to this video which will purely address the land side of the debate and hopefully address some of the issues you've raised. |
It was pretty evident from this debate that there was no representative from the Army, bore, bore, aircraft carriers and typhoon, probably the greatest white elephants for the MoD in the current climate. It was also pretty obvious that their are inter service rivalries. It is time for the MoD to get real and put the money where it is required now and that is the land based op, Afghanistan and the boots on the ground. Park up the tanks, sell them off, mothbal the typhoons and scrap the carriers; does the navy have enough other ships for fleet protection, logistics to support these, No! |
I would like to bring to your attention article written by Patricia Wallace Ingraham “Are you talking to me? Accountability and the modern public service”, published in PS, Vol 38, No 1, pp 17 to 21, in January 2005, where she analysed in depth consequences of contracting out government work. She specifically highlighted total numbers of contracts and their cumulative cost compared to career public servants, and accountability for the performance of public functions and use of public funds. |
-
Naval Construction, Repair and Refit
Le Méridien Piccadilly, London
December 9- 10, 2010 -
Maritime Homeland Security Summit
Renaissance Seattle Hotel, Seattle, WA
November 15- 17, 2010 -
Non-Traditional ISR
Mayfair Conference Centre, London, UK
October 27- 29, 2010 -
Health Support Systems and Medical Logistics
CCT Canary Wharf, London, UK
October 28- 29, 2010
-
MOD Releases Latest UK Armed Forces Manning Figures
26 August 2010 Figures showing that the UK Armed Forces are currently at 99.7 per cent of their full...Read more
UK Ministry of Defence [MoD]
-
FAB holidays help bereaved Service families
27 Aug 10 Now in its second year, Families' Activity Breaks (FAB) are helping Service families as they...Read more
UK Ministry of Defence [MoD]
-
Carrier construction begins on the Mersey
27 Jul 10 The nationwide programme to build the Royal Navy's new Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carriers...Read more
UK Ministry of Defence [MoD]

Replies (0)