Sign Up | Already a member? Sign In
Defence IQ

The Strategic Defence & Security Review (SDSR): A Brave New World for UK Defence and Security


Posted: 06/10/2010

Share |

Rate this Video: (Be the First!)
  Thanks for your rating!




Tags:   SDSR | security | armed forces | RAF | Royal Navy | Coalition

The Coalition Government's spearheading of the Strategic Defence & Security Review (SDSR) comes at a time of widespread transformation in the defence and security sectors. Decisions made in upcoming months will heavily impact not only short term strategic planning in Afghanistan. They will also shape the structure and function of essential security roles currently filled by the Royal Air Force, the Royal Navy, and the Army. Inevitably, strategising solutions to fiscal limitations within the tri-service arena will affect significant touchstones of UK defence - from NATO to Trident to expeditionary deployments. 


“My Government will fully support our courageous armed forces and undertake a full Strategic Defence and Security Review.”
- Queen’s Speech, 25 May 2010

At this time there is nothing more critical than understanding the choices and challenges that face the UK MoD as these decisions are made. The Green Paper published on 3rd February 2010 laid out some key areas that will help frame the Review:

  • Given that domestic security cannot be separated from international security, where should we set the balance between focusing on our territory and region and engaging threats at a distance? 
  • What approach should we take if we employ the Armed Forces to address threats at distance?
  • What contribution should the Armed Forces make in ensuring security and contributing to resilience within the UK?
  • How could we more effectively employ the Armed Forces in support of wider efforts to prevent conflict and strengthen international stability?
  • Do our current international defence and security relationships require rebalancing in the longer term?
  • Should we further integrate our forces with those of key allies and partners?
  • To what extent and in what areas should we continue to refocus our current efforts on Afghanistan?


These issues and more will be discussed in Defence IQ’s exclusive Webinar.  Listen to high ranking experts within the UK Defence Community discuss the strategic implications for the UK military and for national security, as a whole. Join us in the discussion - post your comments and interact with others on our Defence IQ Networking forum .






To View Full Video Content Please Sign in or Sign up

You Should Check Out:

* = required.

Not a member yet? Sign up
User Name:
Password:
View Profile
  Report Abuse  
Zilwiki 06/27/2010 4:45:08 PM EDT

Afghanistan is not the future of all warfare, anymore than the Cold War was. More nations are building up navies, including advanced subs. Sophisticated air forces are increasing, not decreasing. State-to-state warfare will never be extinct. The UK should adhere to the *1998* SDR.
Replies (0)

View Profile
  Report Abuse  
John Geenty 06/16/2010 9:05:25 AM EDT

DS6292, we'll be doing a follow-up to this video which will purely address the land side of the debate and hopefully address some of the issues you've raised.
Replies (0)

View Profile
  Report Abuse  
DS6292 06/15/2010 4:25:11 PM EDT

It was pretty evident from this debate that there was no representative from the Army, bore, bore, aircraft carriers and typhoon, probably the greatest white elephants for the MoD in the current climate. It was also pretty obvious that their are inter service rivalries. It is time for the MoD to get real and put the money where it is required now and that is the land based op, Afghanistan and the boots on the ground. Park up the tanks, sell them off, mothbal the typhoons and scrap the carriers; does the navy have enough other ships for fleet protection, logistics to support these, No!
Replies (1)

View Profile
  Report Abuse  
AJL 06/13/2010 2:44:51 PM EDT

I would like to bring to your attention article written by Patricia Wallace Ingraham “Are you talking to me? Accountability and the modern public service”, published in PS, Vol 38, No 1, pp 17 to 21, in January 2005, where she analysed in depth consequences of contracting out government work. She specifically highlighted total numbers of contracts and their cumulative cost compared to career public servants, and accountability for the performance of public functions and use of public funds.
Replies (0)


Post a Comment
Sign in or Sign up to post a comment
Advertisement

Events of Interest
Advertisement

You Might Also Like